PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON PERFORMANCE OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN NAKURU CITY COUNTY, KENYA
Abstract
This study therefore sought to establish the effect of Project Management Practices on performance of road construction projects in Nakuru County, Kenya. Specifically, the study sought to determine the effect of stakeholder’s involvement on performance of road construction projects in Nakuru County, Kenya and to establish the effect of project planning on performance of road construction projects in Nakuru County, Kenya. This study adopted a descriptive research design. The target population of this study was 107 construction projects implemented in Nakuru by KeRRA. Therefore, the unit of observation was the 107 projects while the unit of analysis was the project managers of these projects. Therefore, the target population for the study was 107 respondents. Census sampling was used whereby all the 107 project managers of each construction project were administered with a questionnaire as the target respondents. Primary data was collected by use of a questionnaire. This study adopted the self-administered questionnaire approach. This study used both inferential and descriptive statistics to analyze the data with the help of SPSS software. Inferential statistics were also used to test the relationship between the study variables. The study used correlation and regression analysis. Pearson R correlation was used to measure strength and the direction of linear relationship between variables. The study results were presented through use of tables and figures. The study concludes that stakeholder’s involvement influences the performance of road construction projects in Nakuru City County, Kenya. In addition, the study concludes that project planning influences the performance of road construction projects in Nakuru City County, Kenya. The study recommends that the management of road construction authorities in Nakuru County should ensure project stakeholders are constantly involved in implementation of the road projects. In addition, the management of road construction authorities in Nakuru County should ensure proper planning of the road implementation to enhance performance.[1]
[1] Wangai, S. N., & Musembi, N., (2023). Project Management Practices on Performance of Road Construction Projects in Nakuru City County, Kenya. International Journal of Social Science Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(2023), 333-342
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blackstone, J. (2010). Theory of Constraints. Retrieved from http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Theory_of_Constraints. 26th March, 2013.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morison, K. (2008). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge Falmer
Collier, P.M. (2017). "Costing Police services: the politicization of accounting", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 57-86.
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E. M., Carpenter, S. R., Hill, J., Monfre-da, C., Polasky, S., Rockstrom, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D. & Zaks, D. P. M. (2017). Solu-tions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337-342.
Freeman, R. E. (2006). A Stakeholder Theory of Modern Corporation. Perspectives in Business Ethics. New York, 1(3), 112–122.
Frimpong, Y, Oluwoye, J. & Crawford, L (2017) Causes of delay and cost overruns in 1156 construction of groundwater projects in a developing countries: Ghana as a case study. Journal of Project Management, 21, 321-6.
Gamborg, C.; Morsing, J.; Raulund‐Rasmussen, K., (2019). Adjustive ecological restoration through stakeholder involvement: a case of riparian landscape restoration on privately owned land with public access. The National Agricultural Library, 27(5), 1073-1083
Goldratt, E.M. (2004). What is this thing called theory of constraints and how should it be implemented?. North river press.
Ika, A., Diallo, A. &Thuillier, D. (2018).Critical success factors for World Bank projects: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Project Management. 30 (2), 105–116
IPBES (2018). Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restora-tion of the Intergovernmental SciencePolicy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Scholes, R., Montanarella, L., Brainich, A., Barger, N., ten Brink, B., Cantele, M., Erasmus, B., Fisher, J., Gardner, T., Holland, T.G., Kohler, F., Kotiaho, J.S., Von Maltitz, G., Nangendo, G., Pandit, R., Par-rotta, J., Potts, M.D., S. Prince, Sankaran, M. and Willemen, L. (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Ger-many
Joslin, R. (2019). Project Management Methodologies, Project Success, Project Governance, Contingency Theory, Agency Theory, and Stewardship Theory. In Project Management Methodologies, Governance and Success (pp. 17-30). Auerbach Publications.
Kariuki, RW, Munishi L, Courtney Mustaphi CJ, Capitani C, Shoemaker A, Lane P, Marchant R. 2021. Integrating stakeholders’ perspectives and spatial modelling to develop scenarios of future land use and land cover change in northern Tanzania. PLoS ONE. [Open Access] Data: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m63xsj417
Lazos-Chavero, E., Zinda, J., Bennett-Curry, A., Balvanera, P., Bloomfield, G., Lindell, C., & Negra, C. (2016). Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: challenges, trade-offs, and strategies in dynamic environments. Biotropica, 48(6), 900–914. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48576586
Le, Q., Nkonya, E., 7 Mirzabaev, A. (2016). Biomass productivitybased mapping of global land deg-radation hotspots. In: Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A. and von Braun, J. (eds.), Economics of land degrada-tion and improvement - A global assessment for sustainable development (55-84). Cham, Switzer-land: Springer International Publishing.
Linsley, P. (2019). Realistic Evaluation as both a science and as a methodology. Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku/Nursing in the 21st Century.
Martin, S. (2017). Project Management Pathways. APM Publishing Ltd.
Mourshed M, Chijioke C. & Barber, M. (2019). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.
Mulder, P. (2015). Scientific Management and Taylorism. Retrieved from Tools Hero:https://www.toolshero.com/quality-management/scientific-management.
Nkonya, E., Anderson, W., Kato, E., Koo, J., Mirzabaev, A., Braun, J. Von, & Meyer, S. (2016). Glob-al Cost of Land Degradation. In: Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A. and von Braun, J. (eds.) Economics of land degradation and improvement - A global assessment for sustainable development (117-166).
Novo, B., Landis, E. A., & Haley, M. L. (2017). Leadership and its role in the success of project management. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 14(1), 73
Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management accounting research, 31, 45-62.
Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (2004). Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE Publications.
Plieninger, T. & Gaertner, M. (2017). Harnessing degraded lands for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 19(1), 18-23
Price Waterhouse Coopers (2017). Annual report on project cycle management. PwC Press Kenya.
Steiner, A. (2018). Restoring our Lands and Forests, Securing our Future. Keynote speech at HLPF side event on “Landscape Restoration for Food Security and Climate Adaptation”. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/newscentre/speeches/2018/restoring-our-lands-and-forests--securing-ourfuture.html.
Wang, J., & Aenis, T. (2019). Stakeholder analysis in support of sustainable land management: Experiences from southwest China. Journal of environmental management, 243, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.00
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.