SCOPE VERIFICATION AND PERFORMANCE OF DIGITIZATION PROJECTS IN STATE AGENCIES IN KENYA

Julius Mong’are Anari, Dr. Jane Queen Omwenga

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between scope verification and performance of digitization projects in Kenya. The study was guided by three key theories: Theory of Constraint, Contingency theory, Theory of Change and the Systems Theory. The study employed a descriptive research design utilizing questionnaires as the primary data collection method, emphasizing a positivism philosophy grounded in quantifiable observations and statistical analysis. The target population encompassed various roles within of digitization projects, totaling 150 individuals, with a sample size of 109 determined through simple random sampling. Reliability was assessed through a pilot test, utilizing Cronbach's Alpha, and statistical techniques were employed for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, multiple regression analysis, and statistical tests such as ANOVA. The study analyzed the research question related to the influence of scope verification and performance of digitization projects in state agencies in Kenya. The study identified a substantial positive influence of scope verification on the performance of digitization projects in state agencies in Kenya as scope verification explained an impressive 36.6% of the variability in project performance (R² = 0.366, F(1, 80) = 46.206, p < 0.000). In conclusion, the study emphasizes the crucial role of scope verification in the performance of digitization projects in state agencies in, Kenya. The findings reveal a substantial positive correlation, indicating that proper scope verification significantly contributes to project performance. Based on the study findings, it is recommended that state agencies and general public should prioritize and enhance scope verification strategies to ensure the effective performance of digitization projects in Kenya. This involves fostering transparent scope validation, conducting regular project metrics and variance analysis.

Key words: Scope verification, Performance, Digitization projects, State agencies, Project success.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, R. (2023). Project performance measures and metrics framework. Research Handbook on Project Performance. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207613.00007

Al-Rubaiei, Q. H. S., Nifa, F. A. A., & Musa, S. (2018a). Project scope management effect on variation orders in government funded projects: A proposed study on the sultanate of Oman. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, 3(Special Issue 1), 52–62.

Al-Rubaiei, Q. H. S., Nifa, F. A. A., & Musa, S. (2018b). Project scope management through multiple perspectives: A critical review of concepts. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016(1), 020025. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055427

Connell, J. P., & Kubisch, A. C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects, and problems. New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, 2(15-44), 1-16.

Giezen, M. (2012). Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.010

Hans, R. T. (2013). SOFTWARE PROJECT SCOPE VERIFICATION THROUGH DELIVERABLE -ORIENTED WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 407–412.

Hashil, Q., Al-Rubaiei, S., Akmar, F., Nifa, A., & Musa, S. (2016). Project scope management through multiple perspectives. Proceedings, 1774(October 2004), 20026.

Jackson, S. (2010). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Economic Survey Report 2021. In Economic Survey 2021. https://www.knbs.or.ke/?wpdmpro=economic-survey-2020

Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Mahmoud, M. (2018). The Role Software Project Scope Verification in Software Development. International Journal of Computer Applications, 182(7), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018917647

Mwangi, L. W., & Yusuf, Dr. M. (2022). Project Scope Management and Successful Implementation of Infrastructural Health Program in Nairobi County. Research Publish Journals. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6563125

Ogunberu, A. O., Akintelu, S. O., & Olaposi, T. O. (2018). Application of project scope management practices on project success among telecommunication organizations in Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(2), 518–532. www.isdsnet.com/ijds

Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management accounting research, 31, 45-62.

Rajala, T., & Aaltonen, H. (2021). Reasons for the Failure of Information Technology Projects in the Public Sector. The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant: With 75 Figures and 78 Tables, 1075–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29980-4_78

T. Hans, R. (2013). Work Breakdown Structure: A Tool for Software Project Scope Verification. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 4(4), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2013.4402


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.