STRATEGIC DYNAMIC CAPABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL STATE CORPORATIONS IN NAIROBI CITY COUNTY KENYA
Abstract
The performance of state Commercial Corporation is indicated by such factors as their contributions to social welfare, job creation, general economic empowerment and improvement of lives of the poor. However, despite the interest in the sector and the subsidies that have flowed into some of the mission-oriented state Commercial Corporations, it seems that most state Commercial Corporation struggle with the challenge of remaining viable over the long-term. The general objective of the study was on effect of strategic dynamic capability on performance of commercial State Corporation in Nairobi city county, Kenya. Specifically, the study seeks to establish effect of strategic innovations capability on performance of commercial state corporations in Nairobi City County, Kenya and to assess effect of quality service capability on performance of commercial state corporations in Nairobi City County in Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive survey research design. A total of 165 management level employees working in state corporations were targeted. The study used primary data that was collected by use of questionnaires. A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of questions for the purpose of gathering information from respondents. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data and make general observations about the data on the relationship between managerial capabilities and Performance of commercial state corporations in Kenya. The study also employed inferential statistics to draw conclusions on the proposed hypotheses formulated in the study. To test the strength of the causal relationships between variables in the study, Pearson’s product moments correlation was used. Results show that there is a strong significant relationship between strategic innovation and corporation’s performance. In addition, the study found that there is a strong significant relationship between quality service capability and corporation’s performance.
Key Words: Strategic Dynamic Capability, Performance of Commercial State Corporation, Strategic Innovations Capability and Quality Service Capability
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullateef, A., Mokhtar, S. & Yusoff, R. (2014). Linkages between dynamic capabilities technologies, knowledge applications and first call resolution in inbound call centres. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 7(1): 68-86.
Almatrooshi, B., Kumar S.S., Farouk, S. (2016) Determinants of organizational performance: a proposed framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65 (6), 844 - 859
Ansoff, H.I., & Sullivan, P. A. et al. (1993). Empirical Proof of a Paradigmatic Theory of Strategic Success Behaviors of Environment Serving Organizations. International Review of Strategic Management, 4, 173-202
Ansoff, Η. I., & McDonnell, E. J. (1990). Implanting strategic management. Cambridge: Prentice Hall.
Argyres, N. S., & Silverman, B. S. (2014). R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 929–958.
Awasthi, P. & Sangle, P. (2012). The importance of value and context for mobile Dynamic Capability services in banking, Business Process Management Journal, 19(6): 864-891.
Barney, J. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120
Barney, J. y Wright, P.M. (1997): “On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage.” Human Resource Management, Vol. 37, nº 1, pp. 20-30.
Becker, M. C. (2004). "Organizational routines: a review of the literature." Industrial and Corporate Change 13(4): 643-677.
Boateng, I.A. & Agyei, A. (2013). Commercial state corporation in Ghana: Development, Success Factors and Challenges. International
Central Bank of Kenya (2017) Annual Report. Nairobi: CBK
Chowdhury, A.M. (2011). Assessing The Factors That Led to The Success of Commercial state corporation in Bangladesh: A Case Study on Grameen Bank
Clulow, V., Barry, C., & Gerstman, J. (2013). The resource‐ based Theory and value: the customer‐ based Theory of the firm. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(1), 19
Cohen, D. (2003) Research Methods. Sample size and Sampling procedure. London:
Coltman, T. (2007). Can superior dynamic capabilities improve performance in banking? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 12:
Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S. (2000) Business Research Methods. 8th Edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston.
Drnevich, P., and Aldas K. (2017). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative Organizational performance . Strategic Management Journal 32: 254–79.
Duncan, R. B. (1972a): “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environment Uncertainty”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp. 313-327
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2012). dynamic capabilities : What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121
Ember, C., & Ember, M. (2011). Cross Cultural Research Methods. New York: Altamira Press.
Fatimah-Salwa, A.H., Mohamad-Azahari, A. &Joni-Tamkin,A. (2013).Success Factors of Successful Microcredit Entrepreneurs: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(5),153-159
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.